Statement of Islamic Emirate concerning launch of US invasion on 15th Mizan

Post via Islamic Emirate

Exactly sixteen years ago today on 15th of Mizan corresponding with 7th of October, American invading forces began their assault on the pure sanctum, air and land of Afghanistan and opened a despicable war of killing the Afghan nation.

The true reason behind this war was America’s arrogant politics and evil policy aimed at invading and enslaving other nations which had no room for rational decision making and that has resulted in sparking a fire, the flames of which are burning Americans to this very day.

The political analysts and inexperienced Generals of US leaders thought that Afghanistan was a bite sized meal which can readily be devoured and added to their list of colonies.

However they were unaware that this valiant nation has broken the horns of every invading force and thrown them into the sinkhole of history.

The American invaders have killed and injured more than a hundred thousand Afghans over the past sixteen years, displaced hundreds of thousands more, thrown them in prisons and beat and tortured them but the only thing the sixteen years have proven are the anti-occupation sensitivity of the Afghans, their unbreakable determination and their unwavering resolve and endurance in the path of Allah as they continue their Jihadic struggle under the leadership of Islamic Emirate with complete firmness without feeling any sense of fatigue whatsoever.

Over the course of this period, the Afghan Jihad against America has gone from strength to strength, their ranks have solidified, have caused the enemy immense losses, a new generation has been trained and employed in their Jihadic ranks and all praise belong to Allah, have cleansed half of their homeland from the evil grip of occupation.

The Islamic Emirate – as the representative of the Afghan nation – reminds the American invaders that no matter how much you prolong the invasion, the end shall no doubt be your defeat and withdrawal. Our nation is not tired nor will it feel fatigue, it is neither disappoint nor will they abandon their struggle. We lunge towards battlefields with high spirits, fervor of martyrdom and with intention of fulfilling the grand obligation of Jihad in the path of Allah. You must understand that such an ideological and hardened nation has never been pacified nor have dreams of conquering them ever been realized.

The best way forward for the American invaders is to understand realities, respect freedom of other nations, prevent further human and material losses, end the longest war in your history, chose an intelligent and rational path forward, withdraw your occupation forces, leave Afghans to their own will, stop interfering in our internal affairs and stop throwing yourself into the ditch of destruction by insisting on arrogance.

We are determined in forcing out all occupying troops. This is our lawful right. We shall protect our freedom, self-determination, Islamic system and people with our souls. Thousands of our youth are still waiting in line for their turn at martyrdom and sacrifice and shall most certainly establish an Islamic government, Allah willing.

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

17/01/1439 Hijri Lunar

15/07/1396 Hijri Solar                    07/10/2017 Gregorian

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Islamic Emirate: Statement concerning opposition to peace process and activities of Political Office

Post via Islamic Emirate

The entire world is aware that the Islamic Emirate is waging a lawful Jihadic struggle against the ongoing sixteen year occupation of our beloved homeland at the hands of America and her allies. The invading countries accused the Islamic Emirate of lacking a program and intention towards finding a peaceful solution and due to their [Islamic Emirate] concentration on war, we too are forced to prolong the conflict.

This is a baseless allegation against the Islamic Emirate.

Finding a peaceful solution to the Afghan problem was and is the policy of Islamic Emirate. In order to clarify this policy, the Islamic Emirate dispatched veteran and experienced diplomats to the capital of Qatar in 2011 after an agreement with the concerned parties to establish an avenue of contact for the efforts of a peace process.

The leader of Islamic Emirate tasked his diplomats with working towards finding a peaceful resolution to the Afghan problem.

If they were to meet delegations from other countries, the sole agenda would be peace and explaining the policy of Islamic Emirate in this regard.

Political Office is an authoritative organ of the Emirate. No other organ or individual of the Islamic Emirate has or will have any permission or authority to conduct open or secret activities in this regard.

The Political Office has done its job however the opposition has repeatedly blocked efforts of a peace process and has now spread rumors about closing the office. This in itself reflects their anti-peace policy.

For example:

It was mutually agreed in 2011 that a delegation from the Political Office of Islamic Emirate will participate in the upcoming Bonn Conference where true efforts will be made towards finding a peaceful resolution. However the Kabul regime launched preventative actions which were accepted by the US. On this same year when political representatives of the Islamic Emirate arrived at Qatar, the Kabul administration showed their displeasure and recalled their ambassador to Kabul in protest.

Following a peace conference in Chantilly of France in the year 2012, it was agreed that in the early part of 2013 another conference will be held in Turkmenistan which shall pave way for peace but once again it was shunned by Kabul.

In 2013 a Political Office for negotiations was officially inaugurated in the Qatari capital of Doha following a series of meetings with American officials. But before any negotiations could commence, Kabul again protested under excuse of office name and flag and the US accepted their view.

In January of 2016 when guests were arriving to a second conference organized by Pugwash in Doha, efforts were made to stop them from leaving Kabul airport.

Similarly another conference was organized by Pugwash on August of this year in Kazakhstan and it was expected that a delegation from the Political Office would also participate however Kabul once again protested which was accepted by the US.

From this one can discern that finding a peaceful solution to the Afghan problem has no room in the policy of the American invaders and their foreign and internal allies. Rather the real strategy is prolonging the occupation of Afghanistan, martyring Afghans, destroying Afghanistan and using Afghanistan as a military base for their imperialistic goals.

Finding a true peaceful solution to the Afghan problem is still the enduring policy of Islamic Emirate. However we must state that if this door of opportunity is shut, all responsibility for the war in Afghanistan and its results will fall squarely on the shoulders of the invaders and their allies.

 

Political Office of Islamic Emirate

09/01/1439 Hijri Lunar

07/07/1396 Hijri Solar                    29/09/2017 Gregorian

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Islamic Emirate: Implications of Taliban attack on Mattis and Stoltenberg

Post via Islamic Emirate

The US defense secretary James Mattis and the secretary General of NATO arrived at Kabul on an unannounced visit the other day.

Upon arrival at Kabul, Taliban pounded Kabul airport with a series rocket strikes. Considering the time and place of this shocking attack which spanned for more than 6 hours, it was a response by Taliban challenging the new war strategy announced by the president of the United States of America.

From an Intelligence Angle

It is military protocol of foreign forces to not inform any Afghan party when key personalities such as James Mattis and Jens Stoltenberg plan unannounced visits however the Taliban still successfully managed to fish for such an important piece of information and planned accordingly for this significant military and diplomatic mission.

As such, this attack not only challenged the abilities of American and other foreign forces based in Kabul but also shocked the US intelligence apparatus who were left scratching their heads as to how the Taliban managed to get a hold of critical piece of information about the arrival of the US defense secretary and secretary general of NATO.

From Military Angle

A. Even though the visit by James Mattis and Jens Stoltenberg were supposed to be secret and unannounced however the Taliban – in such a short period of time – managed to prepare and coordinate such a large attack to greet the new visitors that all the American and internal forces backed by airpower only managed to eliminate the threat after 6 hours!!!

B. The Taliban managed to pull off their ‘guard of honor’ right under the nose of Arg, an area of the city that is supposedly under 24 hour camera surveillance of the Americans and hundreds of other intelligence agencies.

C. The attack was so precise in its execution that the entire focus was on the military section of Kabul airport and civilians were kept out of harm’s way. Contrarily, the foreign and internal forces – who have had control of every inch of Kabul city for the past 16 years – were so thrown aback by the attack that they hit civilian homes instead of the target, resulting in a woman killed and 11 civilians injured.

D. Although the attack was part of the urban tactics in guerilla warfare (hit and run) with a limited timeframe for execution however according to a journalist working with the New York Times, the attack lasted for nearly 6 hours where between 40 to 50 projectiles were lobbed at Kabul airport and all local and international flights were disrupted.

From Propaganda Angle

The time chosen for this attack was such through which the Taliban forced international media to accept the effectiveness of their military and media because the attack was top news in all the important international media outlets and listed in twitter social media network as the third hashtag trending in the United States.

Message of Attack

The US defense secretary and secretary general of NATO are considered one of the most important officials and posts worldwide.

Their trip to Kabul was not unexpected but they first visited India and then Kabul to elaborate on the critical points of the speech given by Donald Trump at the United Nations General Assembly and provide further details about their grand war strategy for South Asia and Afghanistan.

They wanted to discuss the effectiveness of Trump’s strategy towards the Taliban with Ghani and implementation of its later stages. However Taliban sent their message first and practically showed them with military means the true scope of their reach and ineffectiveness of policy chosen by Trump.

Another important point of this attack by the Taliban – which occurred close to the anniversary of conquest of Kabul by the Taliban twenty one years earlier – was to send Trump a message; if America toppled their regime through military intervention sixteen years prior, they too have the military strength to target the US defense secretary and secretary general of NATO in Afghanistan and force them to accept the ground realities despite them expending all their military might.

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ASRA highlights importance of press contacting only official representatives

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Afghanistan: Statement of Islamic Emirate concerning conquest of Kabul on 6th Mizan

Post via Islamic Emirate

On this day (6th of Mizan) twenty one years earlier the capital of our country – Kabul – was freed from the claws of the infighting warmongers and the white flag of peace, security and tranquility was hoisted over it.

This was a memorable day in the history of our country as Kabul was liberated at the hands of Islamic Emirate and civil strife, anarchy, lawlessness and all other ills began receding. The savagery which had gripped Kabul, that darkness and tragic situation is not hidden from anyone.

Freeing Kabul from such conditions and supplanting it with security, peace and tranquility is truly considered a historical moment which the Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate had achieved through sacrificing their lives and limbs.

We again congratulate our believing nation on the anniversary of that historical day. We hope to once again see the white flag of independence and sovereignty fluttering over the capital Kabul and give you glad tidings of approaching moments of emancipation from the brutal invaders.

The conquest of Kabul at the hands of Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate was not only a historical moment that sealed the fate of our country but it was also unique in its arrangement and composition. The forces of Islamic Emirate entered Kabul from multiple directions but neither was anyone’s home or wealth looted nor did civilians suffer losses. Neither were government offices, banks, shops or money exchange centers plundered nor did any such event occur which can be expected under wartime conditions. And the reason behind this was because the Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate – unlike the militias – had not entered Kabul to ransack and spread corruption but had taken the step of liberating Kabul to establish order, administration, peace and an Islamic system.

Kabul – under American occupation and in the claws of their stooges – is again facing conditions reminiscent of the situation this historical city had faced before the 26th of Mizan.

If the lives of Kabul citizens were tormented by war and fighting at that time, this time around they are facing security walls and precautionary barriers of the invaders as well as explicit violations against their religion and customs. No one can speak out or demand their rights due to the transgression and barbarity of the invaders and their stooges. Using constricted alleyways and pathways due to closure of main roads and neighborhoods of this small town has become a painful sore for the locals.

On the other hand, the oppressed locals of Kabul have reached a tipping point due to bribes, illegal seizures, embezzlement, pillage and administrative corruption of the corrupt regime imposed by the invaders and are looking for a savior force which can deliver the heart of Afghanistan from the stooges of America and elements of evil and corruption.

Just as reign of oppression and corruption is limited, Allah willing the day is not far where Kabul shall once again experience the shade of peace, reconciliation and Islamic system through deliverance from the rule of corruption.

And nothing is hard for the Almighty Allah.

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

08/01/1439 Hijri Lunar

06/07/1396 Hijri Solar                    28/09/2017 Gregorian

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Contaminated Blood: Lawyers allegedly deceiving courts claiming old evidence ignored for years is “new” (statement)

Peter Longstaff victim of Contaminated Blood disaster who died in 2005 with wife Carol

Victims of the Haemophilia Contaminated Blood disaster described by Lord Winston as the “worst medical treatment disaster in the history of the NHS” have won the right to take their case to the High Court according to the Guardian (see following link)

Contaminated Blood scandal victims win ruling to launch High Court action

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/sep/26/contaminated-blood-scandal-victims-win-ruling-to-launch-high-court-action

Haemophiliacs were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after receiving contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 80s used to treat their condition. The blood was often imported from the US and later traced back via batch numbers to virally high- risk donors including prisoners at Arkansas State Penitentiary.

However campaigners have raised serious concerns that evidence presented as “new” in some media that allegedly formed part of an application to the court is in fact evidence that is many years old and was placed in the public domain by myself as well as presented in face to face meetings with government officials.

Colette Wintle a respected independent campaigner for women with bleeding disorders who was infected with hepatitis C wrote to Liz Carroll CEO at the National Haemophilia Society,

“We can’t claim to be upholding truth and justice if we are supporting a case on misinformation and evidence that was presented over and over again directly to government since 2009. The government is already aware that the information is not new. I am astounded and appalled by the news today that JJ Evans and his solicitors have held their first hearing in the high courts in a case that is being presented as serving up new evidence! This new evidence is apparently based on the documents Jason Evans has uncovered, however as we all know he is using documents acquired under FOI which are actually the redacted version of what Carol Grayson had released via her husband’s solicitors back in 2006 with an arrangement with the DOH. Not only were these documents 25 years of hard research, but many originated from Carol and Pete’s litigation case against government back in 1991 and Jason is dishonestly using them as “new evidence” which even Jeff Courtenay agreed  with Carol, was a lie.

More worryingly , Carol did contact Collins Law who are acting for this high court case, to advise them that the documents shown to them belonged to her husband’s legal case. She also advised them that she was the only person in the UK to have challenged the DOH on it’s definitive report “The self Sufficiency Report 1973-1991 with an award winning dissertation. It cannot be ignored that she was awarded the Sir Michael Young Researcher of the Year Award 2009 which is the top social science award in the UK. Oh and by the way the co- chair of the APPG for Haemophilia and Contaminated Blood ,Sir Peter Bottomley presented the prize to her. I know this because I was there alongside your predecessor Chris James at the ceremony. Sir Peter’s wife  Virginia Bottomley ex Health Minister at the time in 1991, also designated the haemophilia cases back in 1991 as having a “special case status” well documented in the Hansard. It is interesting that this appears to have been completely forgotten about and ignored in subsequent negotiations until this point.  

 

All of these documents were referenced in Hansard, Newsnight April 2007, and numerous press articles, which means clearly they are not new but old news, and sadly the Haemophilia Society since 2009 have sat on this information and failed to use it for the benefit of the society’s members at a point when politically Lord Archer’s conclusions and recommendations in his report could have been implemented. Where does the society stand on this Liz?”

Statement from Carol Grayson on the news that a legal case can proceed

(27th September 2017)

As a campaigner of nearly 3 decades, I am deeply concerned that a legal firm has gone to the High Court claiming “new evidence” according to the Daily Mail when in fact what has been highlighted so far as “new” is in fact old evidence that was ignored by government, the Haemophilia Society, Health Authorities, plasma companies, the GMC, human rights groups and 5 sets of solicitors for years. That is part of what Andy Burnham calls “a criminal cover-up” on an industrial scale”.

Daily Mail article where old evidence returned to the Department of Health by myself in 2006 to be released through the National Archives at Kew and features in my ESRC Michael Young award winning dissertation is falsely claimed as “new” by Jason Evans,

“The new evidence was found by Jason Evans, 27, whose father Jonathan died in 1993 with HIV and hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products.

Mr Evans, a marketing consultant from Coventry, spent 12 months gathering thousands of documents through Freedom of Information requests and from the National Archives. He said: ‘There has long been concern that there was the use of ‘human guinea pigs’. This is the first time we have evidence that says it in black and white.'”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4662690/Patients-infected-contaminated-samples.html

Evidence falsely claimed as “new” by Jason Evans in the Daily Mail can be found in Chapter 4 of my dissertation (2006) and in the Chronology see link,

http://haemophilia.org.uk/support/day-day-living/patient-support/contaminated-blood/dissertation-carol-grayson-contaminated-blood-products

There is some debate whether Collins Law are still referring to the evidence as “new” which was the basis of their application to the Court for group litigation in the first place. Some media have had to retract the word “new” from articles on the case after complaints were made showing original documents. Yet to my knowledge if Collins Law have changed their mind they have not informed the High Court yet that this evidence is not new?

My awards are for “truth and justice” so it is important to highlight corrects dates of knowledge as to when information was first placed in the public domain. Misinformation is not something for a human rights campaigner to celebrate.

All I have seen so far is that much of the evidence from my late husband’s litigation files which I returned to government in 2006 via solicitors Blackett Pratt and Hart to be released through the National Archives at Kew rehashed under another person’s name. This is exactly what happened in the 2010 Judicial Review against the then Secretary of State for Health, won on key letters myself and Colette Wintle acquired in 2004 in response to several questions on the compensation paid out to haemophiliacs in Eire on a “no liability” basis on the grounds of “extraordinary suffering”. Lord Warner has still not been held to account for misleading parliament.

Contaminated Blood documents I had returned to government in 2006 were released via the National Archives at Kew. These were accessed legally and formed part of my dissertation awarded Michael Young award 2009 (SEE HANSARD BELOW).

                                                      Haemophilia

Jenny Willott: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many and what proportion of documents relating to the infection of haemophiliacs with contaminated blood products which have been returned to the Department of Health by Blackett, Heart and Pratt Solicitors have (a) undergone independent legal examination and (b) been passed to the Haemophilia Society; [119897]

(2) how many documents relating to the infection of haemophiliacs with contaminated blood products have been returned to the Department by Blackett, Heart and Pratt solicitors; and if she will make a statement. [119898]

Caroline Flint: In May 2006, Blackett Hart and Pratt solicitors returned 623 documents to departmental solicitors. All the documents were reviewed by independent counsel, before they were sent to officials in the Department. The vast majority of these documents (604 in total) were released in line with the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000. The documents were sent to a number of individuals at their request and to the Haemophilia Society.

Some documents were withheld under FOI. However, officials are further reviewing these papers with a view to releasing them if possible.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070221/text/70221w0023.htm

 

This evidence was repeatedly presented to government and formed part of my ESRC award winning research in 2006. The government have confirmed many times in writing that a junior civil servant “inadvertently destroyed” government’s own records so are relying on copies which I discovered and sent back.

 

Other campaigners and I are awaiting further legal advice. What is disturbing is that a case I was actively involved in and was closed down by a firm several years ago (that has now gone into administration) has recently been viewed by another firm of solicitors who contacted the client to say “I have reviewed your file of papers and consider you have good prospects of success at this stage and confirm that my firm is willing to act for you on the same terms and conditions” (as the previous solicitors). Why were the earlier solicitors so keen to close the case down despite a large amount of key evidence being presented to them and to a QC by myself and the client?

 

Any public inquiry must include in its remit to investigate how legal cases were handled over the years. One note in my husband’s old legal files reads, “I can no longer lie to my clients”. Why should any lawyer be lying to their clients?

 

Carol Grayson (Haemophilia Action UK)

E-mail to Jeff Courtney, Policy and Public Affairs Manager at the Haemophilia Society 16th August 2017 asking for information on Collins Law case

Jeff,

 

I have not seen Collins Law solicitors retract that the so called “new” evidence is in fact rather old. However if any is presented in court that was put out by myself earlier as new this will be rigorously challenged. If solicitors give false information on dates when released and pass off old as new … what hope for truth and justice! We cannot have lawyers colluding with those that harmed us…. That would be a major “conflict of interest”! If the Haemophilia Society is also knowingly supporting media and lawyers putting out false dates of knowledge that is also a major “conflict of interest” and no different to behaviour of the past. Relevant people have now been informed that information is far from new and that I was blocked. Colette and I have many old letters highlighting this.

 

http://www.collinslaw.co.uk/post.php?s=2017-07-04-momentum-in-contaminated-blood-scandal-grows-as-collins-apply-for-a-group-litigation-order-collins-solicitors-press-release-dated-4-july-2017

 

So if lawyers have backtracked as you suggest please share. We aim to go to court on the evidence as it was produced not on a false narrative… (people pretending its new just so they can get into the press). Why on earth would I share evidence with campaigners or lawyers putting out a false narrative or doing damage limitation for government. This is also abusive behaviour to those that have repeatedly presented this evidence to government that was ignored… to Lord Hunt, to Yvette Cooper and to Anne Milton and many others

 

Carol

I did receive a reply to my public question from the Haemophilia Society on the 22nd August 2017 which should have elicited a public response but the Haemophilia Society as ever is shrouded in secrecy and did not want the reply made public. They have a long history of threatening those who oppose them therefore it was no surprise to be on the receiving end of a written threat once again though the email is marked “confidential” so the content cannot be shared here. 

This is disturbing given they are an organization that is supposed to help and advise members and the reasons Collins Law launched their case is a matter of public interest for which they themselves were keen to speak to press and put out a public statement. The Haemophilia Society has a long history of destroying documents allegedly to hide wrongdoing. The disappearance of documents was recently confirmed by a former staff member. They have a long history of intimidating haemophiliacs and their families which must be addressed at any forthcoming Public Inquiry! Those who question or challenge are left out of meetings. There are also instances where confidentiality has been breached. In addition to ongoing issues with the Society, female campaigners face daily misogyny and abuse despite working hard to release key evidence.

Back in the 1990s the Haemophilia Society threatened to remove me from a protest because I was campaigning for those with HIV and at that time they did not want haemophiliacs with both HIV and hepatitis C at Westminster fighting for justice and were EXCLUDING those with HIV. The Haemophilia Society caused great distress dividing off haemophiliacs by virus, pitting one haemophiliac against another. This was extremely cruel causing serious splits within families.

Links

Michael Young Prize winner 2009: Tackling the blood trade (ESRC Issue 4 2009)

https://web.archive.org/web/20101015225531/http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk:80/ESRCInfoCentre/about/CI/CP/societynow/issue4/blood_trade.aspx

Praise for Press Campaign nearly 10 years on (2009)

http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2009/news/praise-for-press-campaign-nearly-ten-years-on/

Copies of lost “blood row” papers found (Guardian, March 21st 2006)

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2006/may/21/health.medicineandhealth

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) deny allegations of links with Transnational Terror Groups

STATEMENT (14.9.2017):

Links

ARSA: Who are the Arakan Rohingya Salvation

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/09/myanmar-arakan-rohingya-salvation-army-170912060700394.html

End

Carol Anne Grayson is an independent writer/researcher on global health/human rights and is Executive Producer of the Oscar nominated, Incident in New Baghdad.  She is a Registered Mental Nurse with a Masters in Gender Culture and Development. Carol was awarded the ESRC, Michael Young Prize for Research 2009, and the COTT ‘Action = Life’ Human Rights Award’ for “upholding truth and justice”. She is also a survivor of US “collateral damage”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment